Harris Pushes Positivity, Trump Delivers Gloom: Do Vibes Matter?
“Thank you for bringing back the joy!” Tim Walz, Minnesota Gov. and the running mate of Kamala Harris, declared at their rally in Michigan.
On the other side, Donald Trump used a darker speech at his recent Mar-a-Lago conference, covering subjects such as a potential economic depression worse than 1929 or even a world war. He claims that our country is in the most dangerous position it’s ever been in, economically and even from a safety standpoint.
However, Democrats keep going with their optimistic message, and they suggest that voters should rather be motivated by hope than fear. Trump’s camp affirms they are just voicing a reality that many Americans feel, and they also argue that a positive attitude won’t make groceries cheaper or lower gas prices.
Contrasting Campaigns: Harris Champions Joy, Trump Warns of Crisis
In a recent poll, it was observed that about two-thirds of Americans are pessimistic about the state of politics, and almost 70% believe that the country is on the wrong track. Jason Miller, one of Trump’s advisors, considers that vibe checks won’t solve any real issue the US is struggling with.
Democrats still come with their clear message that there is still hope, backed up with a personal story of Walz, who managed to turn a struggling high school football team into state champions.
Minnesota Gov. shares his optimism designed to energize supporters and maintain the momentum built since President Joe Biden stepped aside and endorsed Kamala Harris. In his first week as a running mate, Walz pointed out the power of positivity, and he said: ” This is about caring for our neighbors, showing kindness, and being there for each other when needed. It’s not about mocking or name-calling,”
The Democrat’s approach seemed to be on optimism, and Biden often spoke on his optimism, framing Trump as a threat to democracy. Harris also continues to warn about some potential issues that may come along with Trump’s election, such as voting rights, abortion, and government restructuring, and she is trying to inject hope into her campaign.
Even if Harris condemns Trump’s legal troubles and Walz promotes positivity, there is still a fine line between the two parties.
Before choosing Walz, Harris hinted at making politics enjoyable again, and she declared on every occasion her love for the country and claimed an intense fight for the nation’s ideals. Democrats are sharing with their supporters that they believe in lifting people up instead of tearing them down. Paul Montagna attended the rally near Detroit and noted what a shift Harris has brought since she took over from Biden, declaring, “Kamala is so positive, and it’s refreshing to hear that instead of negativity.”
Trump, on the other hand, comes with the idea that they are just mirroring the country’s current mood, which is concerning as the country struggles with economic issues, border problems, and global conflicts. Their opinion of Harris’ optimism is that it is only a temporary spark that will be followed by months of disappointment.
Donald Trump repeatedly predicted stock market crashes and war, of course, with the inside that he can handle it well if he is re-elected. The direct picture he painted in his campaign is “We’re not going to have a country anymore”, claiming he’s the only solution that stays between the US and a huge disaster. He didn’t hesitate to mention that under a Harris administration, social security will buckle and collapse, and the suburbs will be overrun with violent crimes and savage foreign gangs. By the end of his speech, he repeated twice, “Bad things are going to happen.”
His running mate, JD Vance, represents the sharp contrast of Walz. Especially in media confrontations, he is celebrating the combative style of Donald Trump, and he didn’t hide his feelings about what’s going on. “Right now I am worried about what Kamala Harris has done with the country and to our southern border”, Vance said about the Michigan campaign. His belief is that of course people can enjoy life sometimes, but turning on the news to this is a disgrace.
At a conservative conference in Atlanta hosted by Erick Erickson, Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell echoed the same attitude. Not the most optimistic person as we know, he totally agreed with the bleak outlook, saying “The country is obviously in a bad mood.”
When it comes to Trump’s supporters, they expressed that his campaign actually made them feel hopeful.
How do moods play a role in the way people react and perceive political campaigns?
In this situation, the overall atmosphere is divided between fear and optimism, and the emotional undercurrents can influence voting behaviors and public sentiment. Candidates can align their message with the prevailing mood to tap into common anxieties or uplift the ones feeling disheartened. Trump, for example, focuses on fear and resonates with viewers who are worried about what is happening now in the country as well as in the future.
Trump’s speech is validating their fear; they feel validated and understood. Harris and Walz highlight that hope and positivity seem to appeal to those who prefer an uplifting attitude and vision for the future.
The emotional impact
Both hope and fear are powerful motivators. If fear can drive people to vote out of urgency and self-prevention, leading them to support candidates who promise strong protective measures, hope will inspire voters to believe positive change is possible and they are motivated to choose a lighter, better future.
These two campaigns starkly contrast in tone. We have Harris’s message of optimism versus Trump’s warnings of disaster, which is deepening divisions among the electorate. So, whether it is fear or hope, voters may find their positions based on whose message resonates more with their current emotional state.
There is for sure an impact on decision-making, as moods can affect judgment and impact decision-making processes. For example, a person who is feeling anxious or fearful can turn into a voter who prioritizes short-term security over long-term benefits, while a more hopeful person can possess the ability to take risks for higher promises and future rewards. Two different outcomes will arise from how individuals assess policies and candidates.
An internal conflict can also take place when the mood of a campaign contradicts an individual’s outlook and will most likely lead to cognitive dissonance. An optimistic voter, for example, might feel discomfort and struggle with a candidate’s fear-based messaging. On the same note, a person with pessimistic tendencies will see a hopeful message as out of touch or unrealistic.
Moods influence not only individual voters but also shape the overall tone and trajectory of a political campaign. Tapping into the emotional state of the electorate will easily help candidates rally their base, sway undecided voters, and potentially shift the outcome of an election.
If you’re still in doubt about what you should choose, we can only advise you to get to know the candidates better. This is where you can find Time to Get Tough: Make America Great Again, written by Donald J Trump, and The Truths We Hold: An American Journey, by Kamala Harris, which you get as an Audiobook.
You can read this article next: How Trump’s Hush Money Trial Verdict Could Affect the 2024 Election
